Allowed

Murugan @ Vada Murugan v. State Rep. by

Madras HC18 May 2023CRL OP/10930/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In Crl.O.P.No.10930 of 2023, the Madras High Court granted bail to the petitioner, an accused facing trial for offences under Sections 302, 120(B) IPC, who had been arrested after failing to appear for trial during the pandemic. The court imposed strict conditions including reporting duties and filing an undertaking for speedy trial.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail with a bond of Rs. 25,000 and two sureties, subject to reporting, filing an undertaking, and strict conditions against absconding or tampering with evidence.

Murugan @ Vada Murugan Vs State Rep. by — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

Crl.O.P.No.10930 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 18.05.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN

¶6

Crl.O.P.No.10930 of 2023

¶7

Murugan @ Vada Murugan ... Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

The State represented by, The Inspector of Police, Kurusilapet Police Station, Vellore District. (Thirupathur District). ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C., pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail, in P.R.C.No.2 of 2016 pending committal on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thirupathur, Thirupathur District.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.E.Kannadasan

¶11

For Respondent : Mr.S.Sugendran Additional Public Prosecutor

¶12

ORDER

¶13

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial

¶14

custody on 05.03.2023, in P.R.C.No.2 of 2016 pending committal on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thirupathur, Thirupathur

¶15

Page 1 of 6

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

Crl.O.P.No.10930 of 2023

¶18

District, in connection with Crime No.89 of 2014 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 120(B), 302, 213, 205 of IPC r/w Sections 114 and 109 of IPC, seeks bail.

¶19

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the

¶20

petitioner is an accused (A9) and he is facing trial in P.R.C.No.2 of 2016 pending committal on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thirupathur, Thirupathur District. He further submitted that the petitioner, due to Covid-19 Pandamic situation, was unable to appear before the trial Court on 06.01.2021, thereby, the trial Court has issued a Non Bailable Warrant of arrest against him and pursuant to which, he was arrested on 05.03.2023. He also submitted that the petitioner is prepared to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this Court and also he is ready to co-operate for speedy disposal of the trial. Therefore, he prays for grant of bail to the petitioner.

¶21

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the

¶22

respondent submitted that since the petitioner, who is an accused (A9)

¶23

Page 2 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

Crl.O.P.No.10930 of 2023

¶25

and facing trial in P.R.C.No.2 of 2016 pending committal on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thirupathur, Thirupathur District, has failed to appear before the trial Court on 06.01.2021, a Non-Bailable Warrant was issued against him and pursuant to the same, he was arrested on 05.03.2023. He further submitted that if bail is granted to the petitioner, there is every possibility of him, to abscond again and would derail the progress of trial. Therefore, he opposed to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶26

Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the

¶27

case, the submissions made by either side and also considering the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner from 05.03.2023, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

¶28

Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail

¶29

on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five thousand only) with two sureties , each for a like sum to the satisfaction

¶30

of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thirupathur and on further

¶31

Page 3 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

Crl.O.P.No.10930 of 2023

¶33

conditions that:

¶34

[a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or

¶35

Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

¶36

[b] the petitioner shall report before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thirupathur, on all working days at 10.30 a.m., until further orders;

¶37

[c] the petitioner, after coming out on bail, shall file an Affidavit of Undertaking to the effect that he will co-operate for speedy disposal of the trial;

¶38

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond during

¶39

trial;

¶40

[e] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness during trial;

¶41

[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs.

¶42

Page 4 of 6

¶43

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶44

Crl.O.P.No.10930 of 2023

¶45

State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];

¶46

[g] If the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

18.05.2023

mn/Lpp

The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thirupathur.

¶51

The Inspector of Police, Kurusilapet Police Station, Vellore District. (Thirupathur District).

¶52

The Central Prison, Vellore.

¶53

The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

¶54

A.A.NAKKIRAN,J.

¶55

Page 5 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶56

Crl.O.P.No.10930 of 2023

¶57

¶58

Crl.O.P.No.10930 of 2023

¶59

18.05.2023

¶60

Page 6 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Murugan @ Vada Murugan v. State Rep. by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Murugan @ Vada Murugan v. State Rep. by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Naveen Kumar Patel Vs the Inspector of Police

T.Muthuraj Vs the State of Tamil Nadu Rep by

Ankit Kumar Vs State through

M.Sivakumar Vs The Inspector of Police

Rajesh Vs the Inspector of Police

Raji Vs State Rep.by