Raji v. State Rep.by
Case brief
What is this about?
This single judge order grants bail to the petitioner, Raji, charged with illegal possession of arrack under the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act. The court fixed a bail bond of Rs.25,000 with two sureties and imposed strict reporting and non-interference conditions.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner released on bail on bond of Rs.25,000 with two sureties, subject to reporting police daily and other conditions.
What the court decided
Crl.O.P.No.11259 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 18.05.2023
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN
Crl.O.P.No.11259 of 2023
Raji
... Petitioner
Vs.
The State represented by, The Inspector of Police, Veraiyur Police Station, Thiruvannamalai District. (Crime No.13 of 2023) ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C., pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail pending investigation, in Crime No.13 of 2023, on the file of the respondent.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Balakrishnan
For Respondent : Mr.S.Sugendran Additional Public Prosecutor
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail pending investigation when facing charges for illegal possession of arrack.
What conditions should be imposed on the grant of bail in a case involving local area presence.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Raji
- respondent
The State represented by The Inspector of Police, Veraiyur Police Station
Coram
A.A.Nakkiran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court