D.Gajalakshmi v. The Secretary to Government
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition challenging a suspension order in a service dispute is dismissed as infructuous by the Madras High Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP.No.26439/2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 01.08.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
WP.No.26439/2016 & WMP.No.22651/2016
D.Gajalakshmi
... Petitioner
Versus
5.The Secretary Vinayagar Aided Elementary School Pandarathankadu, Pushpavanam Vedaranyam Taluk Nagapattinam District. ... Respondents
1
WP.No.26439/2016
Prayer : - Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records in relates to the suspension order passed by the 5th respondent in RC.No.4/2016 dated 20.07.2016 and to quash the same and consequently issue directions to the respondents to permit the petitioner in service as a Secondary Grade Teacher in 5th respondent School.
For Petitioner : Mr.V.Kasinatha Bharathi For RR 1 to 4 : Mr.S.Ravikumar, Spl.GP For R5 : M/s.H.Mary Sowmi Rexi
ORDER
(1) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the issue raised in the writ petition has become infructuous.
01.08.2023
AP Internet : Yes
2
WP.No.26439/2016
To
3
WP.No.26439/2016
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.,
AP
WP.No.26439/2016
01.08.2023
4
D. Gajalakshmi
The Secretary to the Government School Education Department
The Director of Elementary Education
The District Elementary Educational Officer Nagapattinam
The Assistant Elementary Educational Officer Vedaranyam
The Secretary Vinayagar Aided Elementary School Pandarathankadu
C.V. Karthikeyan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court