Dr.Shine S.Nair, v. Perunthalaivar Kamaraj Medical
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court allowed a writ petition regarding the selection of an Associate Professor. The petitioner claimed exclusion despite holding mandatory qualifications. The third respondent lacked a PG degree in the specific subject but was selected. The Court noted discrepancies in certificates proving the third respondent's experiential claims and presence of fraud. Consequently, the selection was q
What did the court decide?
Writ petition allowed. Selection of third respondent struck down. Petitioner directed to be appointed as Associate Professor with benefits. Third respondent removed from post. Recovery of salary paid