Disposed

M/S.Sunda Display v. the Secretary to Government

Madras HC29 Aug 2023WP/25475/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court directed the authorities to dispose of pending special revision petitions under the Town and Country Planning Act within eight weeks and restrained respondents from taking coercive steps against the settled building pending such disposal.

What did the court decide?

Directed the Secretary to Government to dispose of the special revision petition within eight weeks; restrained respondents from taking coercive steps against the building pending disposal.

M/S.Sunda Display Vs the Secretary to Government — Municipal and Town Planning | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P.No.25475 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 29.08.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE Mrs. JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU AND

¶6

THE HONOURABLE Mrs.JUSTICE N.MALA

¶7

W.P.No.25475 of 2023

¶8

and

¶9

W.M.P.Nos.24870 & 24873 of 2023

¶10

M/s. Sunda Display rep. by its Proprietor, Mr.Ravindra Singh, S/o Himsingh, M/A 28 years, carrying on business at No.109, Periyar Paathai West, Arumbakkam, Chennai - 600 106.

¶11

A.Poongavanam .... Petitioners vs

¶12

The Secretary to Government, Housing and Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai - 600 009./

¶13

Greater Chennai Corporation, rep. by its Commissioner, Ripon Building, Chennai - 600 009.

¶14

1/6

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

W.P.No.25475 of 2023

¶17

The Executive Engineer, Zone-8, Greater Chennai Corporation (East), 2nd Cross Street, Pullah Avenue, Shenoy Nagar, Chennai - 30. ...Respondents

¶18

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the 2nd and 3rd respondents from in anyway interfering with the building consisting of ground and first floor at No.109 Periyar Paathai West, Arumbakkam, Chennai - 600 106, particularly by way of locking and sealing and demolition pending final determination of petitioners special revision petition under 80(A) and 80(A)(3) of the Town and Country Planning Act dated 21.08.2023 with the 1st respondent.

¶19

For Petitioner : Mr.D.S.Rajasekaran For Respondents : Mr.E.Vijayanand, Additional Government Pleader for R1 Mr.D.B.R.Prabhu, Standing Counsel for R2 and R3

¶20

O R D E R

¶21

The present Writ Petition has been filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus

¶22

forbearing the 2nd and 3rd respondents from in anyway interfering with the building consisting of ground and first floor at No.109 Periyar Paathai West,

¶23

2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

W.P.No.25475 of 2023

¶25

Arumbakkam, Chennai - 600 106, particularly, by way of locking and sealing and demolition pending final determination of petitioners special revision petition under 80(A) and 80(A)(3) of the Town and Country Planning Act dated 21.08.2023 with the 1st respondent.

¶26

The case of the petitioner is that the 1st petitioner is the occupier of the ground floor of the subject premises under lease with the 2nd petitioner, who is the owner of the land and building. Both the petitioners are commonly aggrieved by the action of locking and sealing & demolition notice issued by the 3rd respondent stating that the said building is in deviation of setbacks. Since there is violation, the respondents had initiated enforcement action to bring the building in accordance with rules. Being aggrieved against the same, the petitioners have preferred special revision petition under Section 80 of the Town and Country Planning Act and the same is pending. Hence, the present writ petition seeking the aforesaid relief.

¶27

Learned counsel for the petitioners would state that the special revision petition is pending and the prayer for interim order of stay has also not been considered and hence, the petitioners apprehend that coercive steps will be taken against the petitioners.

¶28

3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

W.P.No.25475 of 2023

¶30

Since the Special Revision Petition under Section 80A is pending,

¶31

this Court, without going into the merits of the claim made by the petitioners, directs the 1st respondent to dispose of the special revision petition dated 21.08.2023, filed by the petitioners under Section 80A of the Town and Country Planning Act, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Till such time, the respondents shall not taken any coercive steps against the building in question.

¶32

The Writ Petition is disposed of with the above directions. No

¶33

costs. Consequently, WMP.No.24870/2023 is ordered and

¶34

WMP.28473/2023 is closed.

¶35

(J.N.B.,J.) (N.M.,J.) 29.08.2023

¶36

Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order vsi

¶37

¶38

The Secretary to Government, Housing and Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai - 600 009./

¶39

Greater Chennai Corporation, rep. by its Commissioner,

¶40

4/6

¶41

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶42

W.P.No.25475 of 2023

¶43

Ripon Building, Chennai - 600 009.

¶44

The Executive Engineer, Zone-8, Greater Chennai Corporation (East), 2nd Cross Street, Pullah Avenue, Shenoy Nagar, Chennai - 30.

¶45

5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶46

W.P.No.25475 of 2023

¶47

J.NISHA BANU,J. and N.MALA,J.

vsi

W.P.No.25475 of 2023

29.08.2023

6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

M/S.Sunda Display v. the Secretary to Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S.Sunda Display v. the Secretary to Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Nalini Vs The Member Secretary

Traffic Dr. K.R. Ramaswamy Vs The Secretary

R.Jennifer Vs the Commissioner

R.Shanmugasundaram Vs The Greater chennai corporation

A.Dhanalakshmi Vs The Commissioner

P.Sudhakar Vs The Tamilnadu State Level Scrunity Committee (Iii)