The High Court dismissed W.P.No.13951 of 2018 for non-prosecution as the petitioner remained absent and uncontactable since 2018, rendering the matter obsolete. Connected petitions were closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.13951 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 29.08.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mrs. JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU AND
THE HONOURABLE Mrs.JUSTICE N.MALA
W.P.No.13951 of 2018 and
W.M.P.Nos.16477 to 16479 of 2018
A.Dhanalakshmi
.... Petitioner
vs
Chennai - 600 020.
1/5
W.P.No.13951 of 2018
No.3, Varadharajanar Street, Vedachala Nagar, Chengalpattu - 603 001.
...Respondents
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to
issue a Writ of Certioarified Mandamus to call for the records fo the impugned order in RJC.(S).C.No.A3/2798/2014 dated 24.06.2014 passed by the 6th respondent and quash the same and consequently direct the 6th respondent to relay and restore the 20 Ft. road portion as it existed before.
For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.D.B.R.Prabhu Standing Counsel for R1,R3 & R6 Mr.E.Vijayanand Additional Government Pleader for R2 & R4 Mr.G.Ethirajulu for r5
O R D E R
When the matter was called on 25.08.2023, the learned counsel for
the petitioner would state that he was not able to contact the petitioner and
W.P.No.13951 of 2018
therefore, he wanted to remove his name from the cause list. This Court, directed the Registry to delete the name of the counsel for the petitioner and to print the name of the petitioner in the cause list.
(J.N.B.,J.) (N.M.,J.) 29.08.2023
Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order vsi
To
3/5
W.P.No.13951 of 2018
Chennai.
Chennai - 600 020.
W.P.No.13951 of 2018
J.NISHA BANU,J. and N.MALA,J.
vsi
W.P.No.13951 of 2018
29.08.2023
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow the continuation of a writ petition for the quashing of an order when the petitioner is absent after more than four years and is uncontactable.
A.Dhanalakshmi
Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai
Collector of Chennai
Zonal Officer, Zone XIII, Corporation of Chennai
Deputy Director of Town Planning District Town & Country Planning Authority
Regional Joint Commissioner (South), Greater Chennai Corporation
J.Nisha Banu
N.Mala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
