R.Jennifer v. the Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
This writ petition sought directions to the Greater Chennai Corporation authorities to consider a representation and take appropriate action. The Court noted that relevant action, including sealing of the premises, had already been initiated. The petition was closed accordingly without costs.
What did the court decide?
No costs. Petition closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.20592 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 28.08.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mrs. JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU AND
THE HONOURABLE Mrs.JUSTICE N.MALA
W.P.No.20592 of 2023
R.Jennifer
.... Petitioner
vs.
- The Commissioner,
- Greater Chennai Corporation,
- Ripon Building,
Chennai - 600 003.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Commissioner and the Executive Engineer of the Corporation were directed to consider a representation dated 10.05.2023 and initiate steps in the manner known to law.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
R.Jennifer
- respondent
The Commissioner, Greater Chennai Corporation
- respondent
The Executive Engineer, Greater Chennai Corporation, Zone VIII
- respondent
The Asst.Executive Engineer, Greater Chennai Corporation, Zone VIII
- other
Royal Landmark Constructions, Rep. by its Proprietor, Mr.Jegan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court