Disposed

Sulaiman v. the District Collector

Madras HC28 Jun 2023WP/18828/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner approached Madras High Court via Article 226 writ petition to quash an order cancelling a legal heir certificate. The Court noted a pending civil suit on the subject matter, closed the present proceedings, and permitted the parties to seek appropriate remedy in the Civil Court.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition closed; parties permitted to approach Civil Court for remedy.

Sulaiman Vs the District Collector — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 28.06.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI

¶6

W.P.No.18828 of 2023 and WMP.No.18058 of 2023

Sulaiman

... petitioner

-Vs-

The District Collector, Kancheepuram District.

¶11

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sriperumbudur, Kancheepuram District.

¶12

The Tahsildar, Kundrathur Taluk, Kancheepuram District.

¶13

Sivakumar

¶14

... Respondents

¶15

Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of Writs of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the order dated 08.02.2023 passed by the first respondent herein in Na.Ka.No.9309/2022/Y.1 quash the same and consequently, direct the respondents 1 to 3 herein to not to cancel/mutate the legal heir certificate issued by the third respondent in Certificate No.TN.7202111021188 dated 27.12.2021.

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

¶18

For petitioner : Mr. G.Mahesh Kumar For Respondent : Mr.M.Alagu Gowtham, GA RR1 to 3

¶19

O R D E R

¶20

This petition has been filed seeking to quash the order dated 08.02.2023 passed by the first respondent herein in Na.Ka.No.9309/2022/Y.1 and consequently, direct the respondents 1 to 3 herein not to cancel/mutate the legal heir certificate issued by the third respondent in Certificate No.TN.7202111021188 dated 27.12.2021.

¶21

When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that with regard to the subject matter, a suit is pending before the trial court. Therefore, without interfering with the impugned order, this Court may permit the petitioner to approach the civil Court where the civil suit is pending.

¶22

Recording the above submission made by the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is closed. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is also closed. However, this Court, without going into the merits of the case, permits the parties to approach the civil Court for getting appropriate remedy. The learned Judge shall decide the issue without

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

¶25

influence of the observation made in the impugned order.

28.06.2023

rli

The District Collector, Kancheepuram District.

¶30

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sriperumbudur, Kancheepuram District.

¶31

The Tahsildar, Kundrathur Taluk, Kancheepuram District.

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

M.DHANDAPANI, J.

rli

W.P.No.18828 of 2023

28.06.2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Sulaiman v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sulaiman v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Pechimuthu Vs The District Collector

K.Sudarmani Vs The Director

Gokul srinivas Vs Union of India

M/s Konkan Aggregated P Ltd., Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

Sivaranjini.U Vs The Vice Chancellor

Dr.B.Sindhu Malini Vs National Medical Commission