Three writ petitions were listed to consider an application by a lower court to extend time for complying with earlier directions. The High Court stayed its hand on the writ petitions after granting the requested extension.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP Nos. 3276 to 3278 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 03-12-2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR
WP Nos. 3276 to 3278 of 2020
K. Pechimuthu Petitioner in W.P.No.3276 of 2020
P.Kanagavalli
Petitioner in W.P.No.3277 of 2020
R.Palanisamy
Petitioner in W.P.No.3278 of 2020
Petitioner(s)
Vs
3.The Tahsildar, Kinathukadavu Taluk, Kinathukadavu, Coimbatore District.
WP Nos. 3276 to 3278 of 2020
Respondent(s)
For Petitioner(s): Mr. V.Ravi For respondents Mr. S. Rajesh Government Advocate, for R1, R3 Mr. V.Kalyanaraman, for M/s.Aiyar & Dolia for R2
ORDER
These Writ Petitions are listed today at the instance of the learned
Principal District Judge, Coimbatore , seeking extension of time, vide letter
dated 25.11.2025, to comply the directions issued by this Court vide order dated
27.06.2023.
by the Court below stands granted finally. No further time will be granted.
WP Nos. 3276 to 3278 of 2020
03-12-2025
Mrp
To
3.The Tahsildar, Kinathukadavu Taluk, Kinathukadavu, Coimbatore District.
WP Nos. 3276 to 3278 of 2020
N.SATHISH KUMAR J.
mrp
WP Nos. 3276 to 3278 of 2020
03-12-2025
K. Pechimuthu
P.Kanagavalli
R.Palanisamy
The District Collector, Coimbatore District
The Power Grid Corporation of India Limited
The Tahsildar, Kinathukadavu Taluk
N. Sathish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
