Dismissed

Suguna v. The District Collector

Madras HC8 Aug 2023WP/10514/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the rejection of a free house-site patta claim. The petitioner occupied government land classified as Poramboke Kallanguthu/water body needed for public use, while family members held title to other lands in the village.

What did the court decide?

The application for a free house-site patta was rejected; the writ petition was dismissed with no order as to costs.

Suguna Vs The District Collector — Property and Title | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

WP No.10514 of 2021

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 08-08-2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM

¶6

WP No.10514 of 2021 And

¶7

WMP No.11101 of 2021

Suguna

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The District Collector, Villupuram District, Villupuram.

¶12

2.The District Revenue Officer, Villupuram District, Villupuram.

¶13

3.The Additional District Collector, (Revenue In-charge), Villupuram District, Villupuram.

¶14

4.Mayavan

¶15

5.Subramani

¶16

6.Murugan

¶17

Page 1 of 6

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

WP No.10514 of 2021

7.Senthil

8.Sankar

... Respondents

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records vide Na.Ka.No.10/28952/2020 on the file of the second respondent dated 12.01.2021 to quash the same as illegal, incompetent and without jurisdiction and further direct the second respondent to issue patta in favour of the petitioner.

¶24

For Petitioner : No Appearance

¶25

For Respondents-1 to 3 : Mr.C.Jayaprakash, Government Advocate.

¶26

For Respondents-4 to 8 : Mr.E.C.Ramesh

¶27

O R D E R

¶28

The order passed by the second respondent in proceedings

¶29

dated 12.01.2021 rejecting the claim of the writ petitioner for grant of free

¶30

house-site patta, is under challenge in the present writ petition.

¶31

The petitioner states that her husband is running a Cycle

¶32

Repair Shop for the livelihood of his family. The petitioner further states that

¶33

Page 2 of 6

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

WP No.10514 of 2021

¶36

she is not owning any land in her name. They are in occupation of the land belonging to the Government. The petitioner states that their family is living in the subject property for many years and accordingly submitted an application for grant of patta.

¶37

The case of the writ petitioner was considered by the Competent Authorities. The Authorities found that the subject property is classified as 'Government Poramboke Kallanguthu'. The subject property is situate, which is part of water body and more-so, the said lands are required for public purposes.

¶38

The respondents have stated that said lands classified as 'Government Poramboke Kallanguthu' cannot be allotted in favour of private persons for the purpose of construction of houses. The subject property is part of water body and more-so required for pubic purposes. On verification, the Authorities found that the family members of the petitioner are owning certain properties in the same village in Survey No.192/5.

¶39

When the family members of the petitioner are owning a land

¶40

Page 3 of 6

¶41

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶42

WP No.10514 of 2021

¶43

in the very same village, the petitioner is not entitled for free house site ptta under the Government Scheme. The encroached portion of the land is required for public purposes and thus the Competent Authorities rejected the claim of the writ petitioner for grant of free house site patta.

¶44

Free house site patta cannot be claimed as an absoute right.

¶45

Free house site patta is to be granted only to the homeless poor people and subject to eligibility under the terms and conditions of the Scheme.

¶46

In the present case, the eligibility as well as the

¶47

encroachment made by the petitioner were considered by the Competent Authorities and the Authorities found that the petitioner's family is not a landless poor family and more-so, the subject property is the water body, which is required for public purposes. Thus, this Court do not find any infirmity in respect of the reasonings stated in the order impugned, which is in consonance with the principles.

¶48

Page 4 of 6

¶49

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶50

WP No.10514 of 2021

¶51

Accordingly, the present writ petition stands dismissed.

¶52

However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected

¶53

miscellaneous petition is also dismissed.

¶54

08-08-2023

¶55

Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No Speaking order/Non-Speaking order Neutral Citation : Yes/No Svn

¶56

¶57

1.The District Collector, Villupuram District, Villupuram.

¶58

2.The District Revenue Officer, Villupuram District, Villupuram.

¶59

3.The Additional District Collector, (Revenue In-charge), Villupuram District, Villupuram.

¶60

Page 5 of 6

¶61

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶62

WP No.10514 of 2021

¶63

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

Svn

WP 10514 of 2021

08-08-2023

Page 6 of 6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Suguna v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suguna v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Kumaravel Vs The Inspector General of Registration

U.Jinadoss, Vs The Taluk Legal Services

A.Karivardhan Vs the Sub Registrar

G.Kaliyammal Vs The District Collector

V.Yellappa Vs The District Collector

Mr. T.Padmanaban Vs Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board