Partly allowed

M/s.Excel Neat and Tidy Agency v. The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner

Madras HC6 Dec 2023WMP(MD)/24579/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order is a S.O. hearing where the Madras High Court granted an eight-week extension to the petitioner to remit the balance provident fund amount of Rs. 28,88,576 and comply with the prior order in WP(MD).No.20041 of 2023.

What did the court decide?

Extension of eight weeks to remit balance amount of Rs. 28,88,576 and comply with the order dated 17.08.2023 in WP(MD).No.20041 of 2023.

M/s.Excel Neat and Tidy Agency Vs The… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶2

Special Original Jurisdiction

¶3

Wednesday, the Sixth day of December Two Thousand and Twenty Three

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice L.VICTORIA GOWRI

¶6

WMP(MD).No.24579 of 2023 in WP(MD)No.20041 of 2023

¶7

M/s.Excel Neat and Tidy Agency , Rep by its Proprietor V.Sriram

¶8

... Petitioner

¶9

¶10

The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Employees, Provident Fund Organization,Regional Office, No.1 Lady Doak College Road, Chokkukulam, Madurai 625002.

¶11

... Respondent

¶12

Prayer :-

¶13

Writ miscellaneous Petition is filed under Article 226 of constitution of India to extend the time period and grant an additional 8 weeks time to remit the balance amount of Rs. 28,88,576/- and comply with the order dated 17.08.23 in WP(MD). No.20041 of 2023 and pass such other or further orders as this Court .

¶14

Prayer in WP(MD). 20041/ 2023 :

¶15

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,praying this court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to calling for the records on the file of EPF Appelate Authority / CGIT vide reference EPFA no. 128/2022 order dated on 03.05.2023 directing the petitioner to deposit of 40 percentage of the dues Rs. 1,19,43,886 and quash the same and to issue such other appropriate directions or

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

1/3

¶18

orders to the 1st respondent and grant such other remedy and relief to this petitioner .

¶19

ORDER:- This Petition coming on for orders on this day and upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/s.V.Malaiyendran, Advocate for the Petitioner No appearance for the respondent, this Court made the following order:

¶20

This petition is ordered and the extension of time for a period of eight weeks is

¶21

granted to remit the balance amount of Rs.28,88,576/- and to comply with the order

¶22

dated 17.08.2023 in W.P.(MD)No.20041 of 2023 from the date of receipt of copy of

¶23

this order.

¶24

Sd/-

¶25

Assistant Registrar(CS I)

¶26

// True Copy //

¶27

/12/2023 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶28

¶29

The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Employees, Provident Fund Organization,Regional Office, No.1 Lady Doak College Road, Chokkukulam, Madurai 625002.

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

2/3

¶32

Copy TO:-

¶33

The Presiding officer, Central Government industrial Tribunal-Cum-Labour court, Chennai.

¶34

ORDER DATED : 06/12/2023

¶35

==========================

¶36

EXTENSION OF TIME

¶37

==========================

¶38

WMP(MD). No.24579 of 2023 in WP(MD)No.20041 of 2023

¶39

Giving direction and etc.

¶40

as stated within.

¶41

MK/18.12.2023 3P 3C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶43

3/3

M/s.Excel Neat and Tidy Agency v. The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s.Excel Neat and Tidy Agency v. The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Subahar Prabhu Vs Annammal

R. Henry Thomas, Vs the Commissioner

The State of Tamil nadu, Vs R.Chamundeeswari

A.Vasanthi Vs United India Insurance Company Limited

R.Krishnamoorthy Vs Sangeetha

Velthai Vs Bashkar