Dismissed

Subahar Prabhu v. Annammal

Madras HC4 Dec 2023CMA(MD)/1115/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court held that since the underlying Appeal Suit No.38 of 2000 was dismissed in favour of the appellants, there are no further proceedings. Consequently, the civil miscellaneous appeal was closed with liberty to reopen. No costs were awarded.

What did the court decide?

The civil miscellaneous appeal was closed with liberty to reopen if necessary. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions closed.

Subahar Prabhu Vs Annammal — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

C.M.A.(MD)No.1115 of 2012

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 04.12.2023

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI

¶6

C.M.A.(MD)No.1115 of 2012

¶7

and

¶8

M.P.(MD)Nos.2 of 2012 and 2 to 4 of 2013

¶9

1.Subahar Prabhu

2.Rajesh Anand

... Appellants

Vs.

1.Annammal

¶14

2.George

¶15

3.Victorial

¶16

4.Edwarts

¶17

5.Gnanaprakasam

¶18

6.Ronickam

¶19

7.Arputham

¶20

8.Gnanamirtham

¶21

1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶22

C.M.A.(MD)No.1115 of 2012

9.Maria Pushpam

10.Wilson

... Respondents

(Cause title accepted vide order dated 13.09.2012 and made in M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2012 in C.M.A. (MD)SR.No.40267 of 2012

¶27

PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Order 43, Rule 1 of C.P.C., to set aside the order and decreetal order dated 09.07.2012 in I.A.No.180 of 2012 in A.S.No.38 of 2000 on the file of the Court of the Subordinate Judge of Kuzhithurai.

¶28

JUDGMENT

¶29

This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed to set aside the order and decreetal order dated 09.07.2012 in I.A.No.180 of 2012 in A.S.No.38 of 2000 on the file of the Court of the Subordinate Judge of Kuzhithurai.

¶30

2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

C.M.A.(MD)No.1115 of 2012

¶32

The learned Counsel appearing for the appellants has submitted that A.S.No.38 of 2000 on the file of Sub Court, Kuzhithurai has been dismissed in favour of the appellants of the present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal. Hence, there is no further proceedings in this C.M.A.

¶33

Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is closed. The appellants are at liberty to reopen the same, if and when necessary. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶34

04.12.2023

¶35

NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes Sml

¶36

¶37

The Sub Judge, Kuzhithurai.

¶38

Copy to

¶39

The Section Officer, Vernacular Records, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶40

3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶41

C.M.A.(MD)No.1115 of 2012

¶42

L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.,

¶43

Sml

¶44

C.M.A.(MD)No.1115 of 2012

¶45

04.12.2023

¶46

4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Subahar Prabhu v. Annammal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Subahar Prabhu v. Annammal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R. Henry Thomas, Vs the Commissioner

The State of Tamil nadu, Vs R.Chamundeeswari

S.Gowtham Balu, Vs The Chairman and Managing Director

M/s.Excel Neat and Tidy Agency Vs The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner

A.Vasanthi Vs United India Insurance Company Limited

R.Krishnamoorthy Vs Sangeetha