Allowed

Ruby Mary, v. Selastin @ Raja

Madras HC13 Mar 2023TR CMP(MD)/30/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is an order disposing of a transfer petition under Section 24 CPC. The court allowed the Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed by Ruby Mary to withdraw a case from the Principal District Court, Pudukkottai, and transfer it to the Family Court, Trichy, admitting no objection from the respondent.

What did the court decide?

Case IDOP No. 101 of 2022 withdrawn from Principal District Court, Pudukkottai and transferred to Family Court, Trichy.

Ruby Mary, Vs Selastin @ Raja — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

Tr.CMP(MD).No.30 of 2023

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 13.03.2023

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN

¶6

TR CMP(MD).No.30 of 2023 and CMP(MD).No.641 of 2023

Ruby Mary

... Petitioner

-Vs-

Selastin @ Raja ... Respondent

¶11

PRAYER: This Transfer CMP filed under Section 24 CPC to withdraw and transfer the IDOP.No.101 of 2022 on the file of the Principal District Court, Pudukkottai to be heard and tried on the file of the Family Court,

¶12

Trichy District for disposal of the same on merits.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.M. Jerin Mathew

¶14

For respondent : Mr. G. Chandru

¶15

1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

Tr.CMP(MD).No.30 of 2023

¶17

ORDER

¶18

This Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to withdraw the case in IDOP.No.101 of 2022 on the file of the Principal District Court, Pudukkottai and transfer the same to the file of the Family Court, Trichy.

¶19

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. The

¶20

learned counsel appearing for the respondent has no objection for allowing this petition.

¶21

In view of the no objection made by the learned counsel appearing for the respondent, this Court is inclined to allow this petition.

¶22

Accordingly, this Transfer CMP is allowed and the IDOP.No.101 of 2022 pending on the file of the Principal District Court, Pudukkottai is withdrawn and transferred to the file of the Family Court, Trichy. The Principal District Court, Pudukkottai is directed to transmit the papers to the transferee Court forthwith. Thereafter, the Family Court,

¶23

2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

Tr.CMP(MD).No.30 of 2023

¶25

Trichy is directed to dispose of the said IDOP as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of Twelve months from the date of receipt of a copy of the records. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶26

13.03.2023

¶27

Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No trp To

¶28

1.The Principal District Court, Pudukkottai

¶29

The Family Court, Trichy.

¶30

3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

Tr.CMP(MD).No.30 of 2023

¶32

C.SARAVANAN,J.,

¶33

trp

¶34

TR CMP(MD).No.30 of 2023 and CMP(MD).No.641 of 2023

¶35

13.03.2023

¶36

4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Ruby Mary, v. Selastin @ Raja

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ruby Mary, v. Selastin @ Raja

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R. Kanagavathi Vs S. Radhakrishnan

P.Subashini Vs P.Palaniappan

M. Anupama, Vs A.S. Sandeep

S.Rudhradevi Vs a. Karthick Alias Arunraj

Muthumari Vs Masethung

K. Balasubramanian Vs Thangaselvi