Dismissed

S.Rudhradevi v. a. Karthick Alias Arunraj

Madras HC13 Mar 2023TR CMP(MD)/9/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court dismissed a Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition seeking to move a filed family law case from Chennai to Madurai. The court refused to entertain the petition as the trial had already commenced following a prior transfer initiated by the same petitioner.

What did the court decide?

Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition Tr.CMP(MD).No.9 of 2023 dismissed with no costs.

S.Rudhradevi Vs a. Karthick Alias Arunraj — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

Tr.CMP(MD).No.9 of 2023

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 13.03.2023

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN

¶6

TR CMP(MD).No. 9 of 2023 and CMP(MD).No.187 of 2023

S.Rudhradevi

... Petitioner

-Vs-

A.Karthick @ Arunraj ... Respondent

¶11

PRAYER: This Transfer CMP filed under Section 24 CPC to withdraw

¶12

the case in HMOP.No.1850 of 2022 on the file of the Principal Family Court, Chennnai and transfer the same to the file of the Family Court at Madurai.

¶13

ORDER

¶14

This Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to withdraw the case in HMOP.No.1850 of 2022 on the file of the Principal Family Court, Chennnai and transfer the same to the file of the Family 1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

Tr.CMP(MD).No.9 of 2023

¶16

Court at Madurai.

¶17

Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials available on record.

¶18

Earlier, the petitioner appears to have filed the Transfer CMP(MD).No.693 of 2021 before this Court to transfer the HMOP.No.04 of 2021 pending on the file of the Sub Court, Paramathy, Namakkal District to the file of the Principal Family Court, Chennai and the same was allowed on 07.03.2022. Pursuant to which, the said HMOP.No.4 of 2021 was ordered to be transferred to the Principal Family Court, Chennai and was re-numbered as HMOP.No.1850 of 2022. The trial has also commenced. The respondent has filed a proof affidavit and and he has also been examined and cross examined. Evidence of the respondent has also been closed. Now, the petitioner has filed the present Transfer CMP to transfer the HMOP.No.1850 of 2022 pending on the file of the Principal Family Court, Chennnai to the file of the Family Court at Madurai.

¶19

Considering the fact that the trial has been commenced and

¶20

2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶21

Tr.CMP(MD).No.9 of 2023

¶22

the earlier Transfer CMP(MD).No.693 of 2021 was allowed and the HMOP transferred to the file of the Principal Family Court, Chennai at the instance of the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to entertain this petition.

¶23

5. Therefore, this Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is liable to be dismissed. It is accordingly dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶24

13.03.2023

¶25

Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No trp To

¶26

1.The Principal Family Court, Chennnai.

¶27

The Family Court at Madurai.

¶28

3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

Tr.CMP(MD).No.9 of 2023

¶30

C.SARAVANAN,J.,

¶31

trp

¶32

TR CMP(MD).No. 9 of 2023 and CMP(MD).No.187 of 2023

¶33

13.03.2023

¶34

4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

S.Rudhradevi v. a. Karthick Alias Arunraj

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Rudhradevi v. a. Karthick Alias Arunraj

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R. Kanagavathi Vs S. Radhakrishnan

P.Subashini Vs P.Palaniappan

M. Anupama, Vs A.S. Sandeep

Muthumari Vs Masethung

Ruby Mary, Vs Selastin @ Raja

K. Balasubramanian Vs Thangaselvi