K.Saraswathi v. the Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
Second Appeal dismissed for default as the appellant failed to appear on the date of hearing despite being listed for dismissal.
What did the court decide?
None granted.
What the court decided
S.A.(MD)No.436 of 2005
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 19.01.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE. S. SOUNTHAR
S.A.(MD)No.436 of 2005
K.Saraswathi ...Plaintiff/Appellant/Appellant /Vs./
The Commissioner, Karur Municipality, Karur. ...Defendant/Respondent/ Respondent
PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, to set aside the judgment and decree in A.S.No.50 of 2004 dated 29.11.2004 on the file of the District Judge, Court at Karur confirming the judgment and decree in O.S.No.915 of 1998 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court at Karur, dated 29.12.2003.
For Appellant : No Appearance For Respondent : Mr.P.Jeyaraman
JUDGMENT
Parties & counsel
- appellant
K.Saraswathi
- respondent
The Commissioner, Karur Municipality
Coram
S. Sounthar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court