The Second Appeal filed by Boominatha Thevar was listed for dismissal. No counsel appeared for the appellant on the date of hearing despite prior notice. The appeal has been dismissed for default alongside a direction to remove the appellant's counsel from the cause list due to lack of instructions. No costs are awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S.A.(MD)No.414 of 2005
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 19.01.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE. S. SOUNTHAR
S.A.(MD)No.414 of 2005
Boominatha Thevar ...2nd Defendant/2nd Respondent/ Appellant /Vs./ 1.Pandikannu 2.Alauddin 3.Sudalaimuthu ...Plaintiffs/Appellants 1 to 3/ Respondents 1 to 3 4.Rajapaneerselvam ...1st Defendant/1st Respondent/ 4th Respondent (given up)
PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, to set aside the judgment and decree dated 26.10.2004 made in A.S.No.6 of 2004 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Ambasamuthram reversing the well considered judgment and decree dated 08.10.2003 made in O.S.No.187 of 1996 on the file of the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Cheranmahadevi.
For Appellant : No Appearance For R1 to R3 : Mr.A.Arumugam
S.A.(MD)No.414 of 2005
JUDGMENT
When the matter was listed on 12.01.2023, the learned counsel for the appellant made an endorsement reporting 'no instructions'. Therefore, the Registry was directed to remove the name of the learned counsel for the appellant and print the name of the appellant.
2.Today, the second appeal is listed under the caption 'for dismissal' and the name of the appellant is also printed in the cause list. However, there is no representation for the appellant. Hence, this Second Appeal is dismissed for default. No costs.
19.01.2023
Index: Yes / No Internet: Yes / No ta
2/4
S.A.(MD)No.414 of 2005
TO:
VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,
Madurai.
S.A.(MD)No.414 of 2005
S. SOUNTHAR, J.
ta
Judgment made in S.A.(MD)No.414 of 2005
Dated: 19.01.2023
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Boominatha Thevar
Pandikannu
Alauddin
Sudalaimuthu
Rajapaneerselvam
S. Sounthar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
