The Bishop, v. S.Daniel
Case brief
What is this about?
In this second appeal under Section 100 of CPC, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed the appeal as abated, holding that the sole respondent was deceased and his legal representatives were unavailable.
What did the court decide?
Second appeal dismissed as abated; no costs; connected miscellaneous petition closed.
What the court decided
S.A(MD)No.1095 of 2011
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 12.01.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR
S.A(MD)No.1095 of 2011 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2011
- 1.The Bishop,
The Church of South India, Tiruchirappalli – Thanjavur Diocese, CSI Diocesan Office,
- Puthur, Trichy – 7.
- 2.The Secretary/Project Co-ordinator, Council for Child Care, The Church of South India, Tiruchirappalli – Thanjavur Diocese, CSI Diocesan Office, Puthur, Trichy – 7.
- 3.The Correspondent, The Arul Illam, CSI Boys Home, Mahimaipuram, Jeyankondam, Perambalur – 621 802.
... Appellants/Plaintiffs
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the second appeal admits to hearing when the sole respondent is dead and his legal representatives are unavailable.
By what procedure to close the matter when the appellant is unable to find details of the legal representatives of the deceased respondent.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
The Bishop, The Church of South India, Tiruchirappalli – Thanjavur Diocese, CSI Diocesan Office, Puthur, Trichy
- respondent
S. Daniel
Coram
S. Sounthar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court