A.Palaniappan v. K.Uma
Case brief
What is this about?
In this Second Appeal, the appellant's counsel moved for withdrawal. The court dismissed the Second Appeal as withdrawn without costs, as the appeal had been abandoned.
What did the court decide?
Second Appeal dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
What the court decided
S.A(MD)No.373 of 2008
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 10.02.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR
S.A(MD)No.373 of 2008
A.Palaniappan
... Appellant/Respondent/Plaintiff
Vs.
1.K.Uma 2.Muthumeenal 3.K.Veerappan ... Respondents/Appellants/Defendants
PRAYER :-
This Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree of the District Judge, Sivagangai in A.S.No.46 of 2006, dated 04.06.2007, partly set-aside the judgment and decree of the Subordinate Judge, Devakottai in O.S.No.7 of 2004, dated 02.03.2005.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
A.Palaniappan
- respondent
K.Uma
- respondent
Muthumeenal
- respondent
K.Veerappan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court