K.Uma v. a.Palaniappan
Case brief
What is this about?
This brief order regarding a Cross Objection dismissed the matter as settled out of court based on a letter from the respondent indicating an amicable settlement, rendering the appeal unnecessary.
What did the court decide?
The Cross Objection is dismissed as settled out of court.
What the court decided
Cross. Objection (MD)No.49 of 2008
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 10.02.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR
Cross. Objection (MD)No.49 of 2008 in S.A.(MD)No.373 of 2008
1.K.Uma 2.Muthumeenal 3.K.Veerappan ... Cross Objectors/Respondents
Vs.
A.Palaniappan ... Respondent/Appellant
PRAYER :-
This Cross Objection is filed under Order 41 Rule 22 r/w Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.46 of 2005 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Sivagangai, dated 04.06.2007 reversing the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.7 of 2004 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Devakottai, dated 02.03.2005.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.Uma
- petitioner
Muthumeenal
- petitioner
K.Veerappan
- respondent
A.Palaniappan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court