Rakku v. Periaammal
Case brief
What is this about?
Second Appeal filed under Section 100 CPC against the judgment of the Subordinate Judge. The High Court upheld the lower court's decision confirming the decree of the District Munsif and dismissed the appeal with no costs.
What did the court decide?
The Second Appeal is dismissed, confirming the judgment and decree dated 18/08/2010 made in O.S.No.151 of 2005.
What the court decided
SA(MD). No.100 of 2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Ninth day of February Two Thousand and Twenty Three PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.SOUNTHAR SA(MD). No.100 of 2013
- RAKKU
- SELVAM ... Appellants/Appellants/Defendants
Vs
- PERIAAMMAL ... Respondent/Respondent/Plaintiff
Prayer :-
This Second Appeal filed under section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Sivakasi in A.S. NO.3 of 2011, dated 12/01/2012, confirming the judgment and decree of the learned District Munsif, Sivakasi made in O.S.NO.151 of 2005, Dated 18/08/2023.
Decree:-
This Second Appeal coming on for hearing on this day, upon perusing the grounds of Appeal, the judgments and decrees of the Lower Appellate court and the court of First Instance and the material papers in the suit and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.M.Ashokkumar, Advocate for the appellant and of Mr.V.Srinivasan, Advocate for the respondent, this court doth order and decree as follows:-
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the under appeal judgment and decree passed by the Subordinate Judge confirming the Munsif court decree should be modified or confirmed.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
RAKKU
- appellant
SELVAM
- respondent
PERIAAMMAL
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court