Maheswaran, v. Muthiah
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madras High Court dismissed a Civil Revision Petition for default as the petitioners were not residing at the recorded address. No useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending.
What did the court decide?
The Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for default; costs not awarded; connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
What the court decided
CRP(NPD)(MD).No.629 of 2018
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 21.09.2023
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN
CRP(NPD)(MD).No. 629 of 2018 and CMP(MD).No.2752 of 2018
1.Maheswaran 2.Punitharani
Petitioners
Vs.
Muthiah
Respondent
PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition filed under under Section 115 CPC against the fair and decreetal order, dated 05.01.2018 made in I.A.No.42 of 2016 in O.S.No.93 of 2010 on the file of the Sub Court, Thuraiyur.
For Petitioner : No appearance
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Civil Revision Petition should be dismissed due to default in appearance.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Maheswaran
- petitioner
Punitharani
- respondent
Muthiah
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court