Allowed

A.R.Hamsini v. P.Prasanth Krishna

Madras HC20 Sept 2023CRP(MD)/2361/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

, this High Court allowed a Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution. The Court, noting the five-year pendency of the C.B.C. case at the enquiry stage, directed the learned Judicial Magistrate, Melur, to dispose of the proceedings expeditiously within nine months.

What did the court decide?

The learned Judicial Magistrate, Melur is directed to dispose of proceedings in D.V.C.No.23 of 2018 within nine months.

A.R.Hamsini Vs P.Prasanth Krishna — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

C.R.P(PD)(MD)No.2361 of 2023

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 20.09.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN

¶6

C.R.P(PD)(MD)No.2361 of 2023

¶7

A.R.Hamsini : Petitioner/Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

1.P.Prasanth Krishna 2.K.Panneerselvam 3.Mythili : Respondents/Respondents

¶10

PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to direct the learned Judicial Magistrate, Melur to dispose the proceedings in D.V.C.No.23 of 2018 on its file within stipulated time frame as may be prescribed by this Court.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Aravinthan

¶12

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶13

1/4

¶14

C.R.P(PD)(MD)No.2361 of 2023

¶15

ORDER

¶16

The Civil Revision Petition has been filed seeking a direction to dispose of petition in D.V.C.No.23 of 2018 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Melur, within a specified time to be fixed by this Court.

¶17

The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petition in D.V.C.No.23 of 2018, is pending more than 5 years at the stage of enquiry and there is no progress. Hence, the above said case has to be expedited.

¶18

Since the Civil Revision Petition is filed for early disposal of the

¶19

case, issuance of notice to the respondents is not necessary.

¶20

From perusal of 'B' diary, Cr.M.P.No.681 of 2022, is pending from

¶21

March 2022, at the stage of enquiry. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the pendency of the petition in Cr.M.P. No.681 of 2022 for quiet long time, this Court deems it appropriate to give some directions to the Court below.

¶22

2/4

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

C.R.P(PD)(MD)No.2361 of 2023

¶25

In the result, the Civil Revision Petition is allowed, the learned Judicial Magistrate, Melur, is directed to dispose of the proceedings in D.V.C.No.23 of 2018, as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of nine (09) months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. No costs.

¶26

20.09.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No das

¶27

¶28

1.The Judicial Magistrate, Melur.

¶29

2.The Section Officer Vernacular Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶30

3/4

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

C.R.P(PD)(MD)No.2361 of 2023

¶33

C.KUMARAPPAN,J.

¶34

das

¶35

C.R.P(PD)(MD)No.2361 of 2023

¶36

20.09.2023

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶38

4/4

A.R.Hamsini v. P.Prasanth Krishna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A.R.Hamsini v. P.Prasanth Krishna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jeyarathnam,S/O.Appadurai Vs Samuel Nickson,S/O.Jebaveeran

S.Rajagopal Vs M.Asaithambi

Chithambaram Vs Athinaryanaperumal

N.Rajamani, S/O.Nataraja Vs P.Nallusamy

S.Jegathambal Vs P.Saravana Muthupanidan

Arjunraj Vs Vijayakumari