The Madurai Bench continued adjournment and representative's counsel claimed that the prayer in the civil revision petition became infructuous. The court dismissed the petition as infructuous.
Civil Revision Petition dismissed as infructuous. Connected miscellaneous petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P.(MD).No.851 of 2019
-BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 20.09.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN
C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.851 of 2019 and
C.M.P(MD) No.5059 of 2019
N.Rajamani ... Petitioner/Respondent/Plaintiff
-vs-
... Respondent/Petitioners/ Defendants
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the fair and decreetal order dated 05.02.2019 made in I.A.No.640 of 2018 in O.S.No.187 of 2014 on the file of the learned Principal District Munsif, Karur.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Palani Raja
For Respondents : Mr.R.Suresh Kumar
1/3
C.R.P.(MD).No.851 of 2019
O R D E R
When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner represented that the prayer sought for in this Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous. Therefore, he prayed to dismiss the Civil Revision Petition as infructuous.
20.09.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No ebsi
To 1. Th e Principal District Munsif, Karur.
2/3
C.R.P.(MD).No.851 of 2019
C.KUMARAPPAN,J.
ebsi
C.R.P(PD)(MD)No.851 of 2019
20.09.2023
N.Rajamani
P.Nallusamy
N.Kandasamy
C.Kandasamy
C.Kumarappan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
