Vimala v. Umamaheswari
Case brief
What is this about?
Revision petition challenging an order dismissing an impleading application by a wife who claimed property transferred by husband after suit filing. High Court found no illegality and dismissed.
What did the court decide?
Civil Revision Petition dismissed with no costs; connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition closed.
What the court decided
C.R.P(MD)No.152 of 2023
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 13.02.2023
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
C.R.P(MD)No.152 of 2023 and C.M.P(MD)No.728 of 2023
Vimala ... Petitioner/Petitioner/ Proposed Party Vs.
1.Umamaheswari ... Respondent/1st Respondent/ Plaintiff 2.Subramanian 3.Manikandan 4.Meenakumari 5.Chellachamy 6.The Sub Registrar, Musiri Sub Registrar Office, Musiri Taluk, Trichirappalli District. ... Respondents/Respondents/ Defendants 1 to 5
1/5
C.R.P(MD)No.152 of 2023
PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to call for the records of the Principal District Munsif Court, Musiri, Tiruchirappali District made in I.A.No.3 of 2022 in O.S.No.89 of 2015 and set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 09-11-2022.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application to implead a party as owner of property settled during pendency of suit lacks illegality warranting judicial interference under Article 226.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Vimala
- respondent
Umamaheswari
- respondent
Subramanian
- respondent
Manikandan
- respondent
Meenakumari
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court