Disposed

The Branch Manager v. Valli

Madras HC11 Feb 2023CMA(MD)/904/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A National Lok Adalat concluded a settlement between New India Assurance Company and claimants. The company deposited Rs. 23,09,800/-, and claimants agreed to Rs. 18,00,000/-. The award outlines withdrawal rights and refund of court fees.

What did the court decide?

Settlement recorded with full deposit of award amount by appellant; payment of Rs. 18,00,000/- to claimants and refund of court fees.

The Branch Manager Vs Valli — Insurance | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTE, MADURAI

¶2

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625023

¶3

Saturday the 11th day of February 2023 NATIONAL LOK ADALAT AWARD

¶4

(Chapter VI and u/s 21 or Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987)

¶5

Presided Over by

¶6

The Honourable Mr Justice R.VIJAYAKUMAR

¶7

and

¶8

Members

¶9

MR.A.SUBRAMANIAN, District Judge(Retired) & MR.T.S.MOHAMMED MOHIDEEN, Advocate

¶10

CMA(MD) No.904 of 2019

¶11

(Appeal against the judgment and decree passed on 08/02/2019 in MCOP.4/2016 on the file of the SUB JUDGE, DEVAKOTTAI)

¶12

The Branch Manager, The New India Assurance Company, Ist Floor, PPK Complex, South Main Street, Ambalapuram, Puthukottai, Puthukottai District.

... Appellant

Versus

1.Valli

W/o.Bose(late), D.No.3/785, Keeranipatti Village, Madhavar St, Karaikudi Tk, Sivagangai Dt.

¶17

2.Minor.Charmiya

¶18

D/o.Bose(late), D.No.3/785, Keeranipatti Village, Madhavar St, Karaikudi Tk, Sivagangai Dt.

¶19

3.Minor.Santhosh

¶20

S/o.Bose(late), D.No.3/785, Keeranipatti Village, Madhavar St, Karaikudi Tk, Sivagangai Dt. (Minors 2nd and 3rd respondents rep. through their Mother/1st Respondent)

¶21

4.Murugesan

¶22

S/o.Ramaiya Pillai, D.No.25/33, VOC Road, Mayana Pathai, Karaikudi Tk, Sivagangai Dt.

¶23

5.Subramanian

¶24

D.No.3/33, Yadhavar Street, Koviloor, Karaikudi Tk, Sivagangai Dt.

¶25

1/3

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/3

¶27

... Respondent/s

¶28

This case came up for settlement before the Lok Adalat. Both the parties present. The counsel for the appellant Mr.N.Dilip Kumar and the counsel for the respondents Mr.S.Shanmugam for M/s.Ajmal Associates are present. After mutual discussion, negotiation, mediation and conciliation between both parties and with the assistance of the Bench, both sides consented for settlement.

¶29

AWARD

¶30

The Insurance Company has filed the above appeal challenging the award amount of Rs.23,09,800/- passed by the Tribunal.

¶31

The parties have filed a joint compromise memo admitting to receive a sum of Rs.18,00,000/- as full quit. The entire amount has already been deposited before the concerned Tribunal. Therefore, the first and second claimants (now the second claimant is declared as major) shall be entitled to withdraw their respective share along with accrued interest.

¶32

3.The appellant Insurance Company has already deposited the entire award amount. The appellant Insurance Company is entitled to withdraw the balance amount, along with accrued interest.

¶33

The share of the minor third claimant shall be deposited in any one of the Nationalized Bank. The First claimant being the mother is entitled to withdraw the interest once in six months till he attains majority.

¶34

The Branch Manager

¶35

The New India Assurance Company, Puthukottai District.

¶36

Counsel for the Appellant

¶37

Valli

¶38

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/3

¶39

Minor.Charmiya

¶40

Minor. Santhosh

¶41

Counsel for the Respondents

¶42

This Lok Adalat award is passed in terms of the above settlement.

¶43

The full Court fee paid shall be refunded to the appellant in the manner provided under Section 69-A of the Tamilnadu Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955 and the Court Fees Act, 1870 as provided for under sub Sec.1 of Section 21 r/w 25 of LSA Act 1987 as amended in 1994.

JUDGE

MEMBER

MEMBER

To: The Parties/Advocate concerned Copy To

¶48

SUB JUDGE, DEVAKOTTAI.

¶49

The Officer-in-Charge, High Court Legal Services Committee, Madurai.

¶50

The Section Officer, V.R. Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶51

Typed By PJL/PS/TA PA To The Hon'ble Judges

¶52

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3/3

The Branch Manager v. Valli

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Branch Manager v. Valli

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.R.Dennish Raj Vs Mahalingam

K. Jagadeesan, Vs S. Muruganantham

Imayan Vs P.Ganagarathinam

The New India Assurance Company Ltd., Vs Natarajan

The New India Assurance Company Ltd., Vs Alagammal

Jeyachandran, Vs Kamatchinathan