Venkitasamy Naidu, viz., Rajendran, Manoharan, Nagendran and Ravichandran. The said Venkitasamy and his sons, viz., Ravichandran and Manoharan, have died intestate and thereafter, the respondent, who is the wife of the said Venkitasamy Naidu, is maintaining the said property. The respondent claims that after the death of the said Ganga Naidu and Venkitasamy Naidu, the rent was mutually revised and the petitioner started paying the monthly rent of Rs.3,000/- to the petitioner within 7th day of every English Calendar month. She further claims that the petitioner has stopped paying the rents payable from the month of September 2009 inspite of repeated demands made by her. Therefore, she issued a legal notice dated 17.10.2011 demanding the petitioner to pay the rents payable after deducting the advance amount of Rs.10,000/-. She also claims that the respondent is in arrears of the monthly rents payable for the months of September 2009 to February 2012 in total for 30 months amounting to Rs.90,000/- and after deducting the advance amount of Rs.10,000/- he is in arrears of a sum of Rs.80,000/- and hence, she has filed the RCOP No.106 of 2012 for evicting the petitioner and directing to vacate and deliver the vacant possession of the said property. During the course of the trial, the petitioner has filed in I.A. Nos.1 and 2 of 2019 and
