Ayyammal v. Poorani
Case brief
What is this about?
Court dismissed an infructuous civil revision petition under Article 226 against an order in a family suit. Petitioner counsel withdrew as the matter was rendered moot.
What did the court decide?
Pet the civil revision petition be dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
What the court decided
C.R.P.No.3837 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated: 02.08.2023
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN
C.R.P.No.3837 of 2015
Ayyammal ... Petitioner
Vs
1.Poorani 2.Ayyanaar 3.Minor Arunkumar 4.Minor.Arunpandiyan 5.Arumugam ...Respondents
Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of
India to set aside the order dated 28.11.2014 made in I.A.No.252 of 2014 in O.S.No.367 of 2009 on the file of the Additional District Munsif of
Villuppuram by allowing this CRP.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ayyammal
- respondent
1.Poorani
- respondent
2.Ayyanaar
- respondent
3.Minor Arunkumar
- respondent
4.Minor.Arunpandiyan
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court