S.Prankia v. S.Deppan Sakthivel
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court下单了Father power of attorney withdrew the application and noting that the petitioner remarried, the High Court closed the revision as settled out of court without costs.
What did the court decide?
Civil Revision Petition closed as settled out of court. No costs.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRP No.2072 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 01.08.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN
C.R.P.No.2072 of 2019 and CMP No.13371 of 2019
S.Prankia ... Petitioner
Vs
S.Deppan Sakthivel ... Respondent
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order and decreetal order dated 28.04.2018 made in I.A.No.336 of 2018 in HMOP No.1115 of 2016 on the file of Family Court, Coimbatore.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Suresh Babu For Respondent : Mr.I.Abrar Md.Abdullah
ORDER
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to decide the merits or close the proceeding where the matter has been settled out of court?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S. Prankia
- respondent
S. Deppan Sakthivel
Coram
V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court