Natarajan v. Andal
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a dismissal order in a Civil Revision Petition. The Court dismissed the petition because the petitioner's counsel refused to argue before the Court, citing the absence of the respondents' counsel. The matter was previously adjourned for dismissal on similar grounds.
What did the court decide?
The Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs.
What the court decided
C.R.P.No.1078 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 15.06.2023
CORAM:
The Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP
C.R.P.No.1078 of 2021 and C.M.P.No.8480 of 2021
Natarajan
... Petitioner/Petitioner/ Appellant/Defendant
-Vs-
1.Andal 2.Savithiri
...Respondents/Respondents/ Respondents/Plaintiffs
Prayer:- Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 06.02.2020 made in I.A.No.65 of 2017 in Un-Numbered A.S.No. Of 2017 on the file of the Principal Sub-Court, Dharmapuri.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Natarajan
- respondent
1 Andal
- respondent
2 Savithiri
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court