Revision Petitioner is the wife, the Respondent is the husband had filed H.M.O.P.No.973 of 2018, seeking dissolution of marriage. The learned II Additional Principal Judge Family Court, Chennai, had granted a decree of dissolution of marriage as per order dated 14.03.2019. It was an ex parte decree. The Revision Petitioner herein, who was the Respondent in H.M.O.P.No.973 of 2018, did not file any Petition to set aside the ex parte decree. While so, in the month of October after six months, after disposal of H.M.O.P.No.973 of 2018, the Respondent herein had issued an advocate notice to the wife seeking return of gold jewels and spending nearly Rs.8 lakhs for the marriage by notice dated 03.09.2019, which was replied by the Revision Petitioner wife by advocate notice dated 06.09.2019. After receipt of the reply notice by the wife, the husband had issued rejoinder notice dated 30.09.2019. After exchange of notice, the husband had filed Petition in I.A.No.1 of 2019 in H.M.O.P.No.973 of 2018 under Section 27 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, seeking return of gold jewels. After receipt of notice from the Family Court the wife as Respondent in I.A.No.1 of 2019 in H.M.O.P.No.973 of 2018 had filed counter resisting the same. After due enquiry, the learned II Additional Principal Judge Family Court, Chennai, had passed an order directing the Respondent (wife) to return the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/8
