Allowed

K.M.Tamilselvan v. Subramani

Madras HC9 Sept 2023CRL RC/277/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A National Lok Adalat hearing under the Legal Services Authorities Act settled a Criminal Revision Petition arising from a conviction under Section 138 NI Act. Upon mutual agreement where the accused paid the requisite compensation, the court set aside the conviction and allowed the revision.

What did the court decide?

The conviction and sentence imposed in C.A.No.47 of 2022 and STC.No.21 of 2016 were set aside; the Criminal Revision Petition was allowed subject to the settlement agreement.

K.M.Tamilselvan Vs Subramani — Cheque Dishonour | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, CHENNAI National Lok Adalat organised by the High Court Legal Services Committee Saturday, the 9th day of September, 2023 NATIONAL LOK ADALAT AWARD (Chapter VI and u/s 21 of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987) Presided over by

¶2

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN and

¶3

Members

¶4

Mrs. V.Ahalya, District Judge (Retired) Mrs. D.Sathya, Advocate

¶5

Crl.R.C.No.277 of 2023

¶6

(Revision against the conviction and sentence imposed on 03.01.2023. in C.A.No.47 of 2022 on the file of the Court of Sessions Division of the Nilgiris District at Udhagamandalam confirming the conviction and sentence imposed on 04.04.2022 in STC.No.21 of 2016 on the file of the Learned Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magisterial level, Coonoor )

¶7

K.M.Tamilselvan ...Petitioner/Appellant/Accused

¶8

Vs.

¶9

Subramani

¶10

...Respondent/Respondent/ Complainant

¶11

On representation of the counsel for both sides this case is taken up for settlement before the Lok Adalat. Both the parties are present. Ms.Vinothini, learned counsel for Mr.E.V.Chandru , learned counsel for the petitioner. After mutual discussion, negotiation, mediation and conciliation between both parties, they arrived at a compromise to settle the matter as follows:

¶12

TERMS OF SETTLEMENT

¶13

The Criminal Revision Petitioner, Mr.K.M.Tamilselvan and the respondent Subramani are present before the Court.

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

1/4

¶16

2.The Revision arises against the order passed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The petitioner and the respondent have settled the matter and have entered into an agreement on 22.12.2022, where under, the petitioner has agreed to pay the respondent a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs only).

¶17

3.As per the agreement, the petitioner paid the said amount to the respondent.

¶18

4.The respondent confirms that he has also received the sum of Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs only).

¶19

5.The conviction and sentence imposed by the Judgement dated 03.01.2023 made in C.A.No.47 of 2022 on the file of the Hon'ble Court of Sessions Division of the Nilgiris District at Udhagamandalam confirming the conviction and sentence imposed on 04.04.2022 in STC.No.21 of 2016 on the file of the Learned Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magisterial level, Coonoor is set aside by virtue of the settlement arrived between the parties.

¶20

6.Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Petition is allowed.

¶21

K.M.Tamilselvan Counsel for the Petitioner

¶22

Subramani

¶23

Counsel for the Respondent

¶24

This Lok Adalat award is passed in terms of the above settlement.

¶25

The full Court fee paid shall be refunded to the parties in the manner provided under the Court Fees Act, 1870 as provided for under sub Sec.1 of Section 21 r/w 25 of LSA Act, 1987 as amended in 1994.

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

2/4

Member

Judge

Member

Tsg

To:The parties/Advocate concerned Copy to:

¶33

1.The Court of Sessions Division of the Nilgiris District at Udhagamandalam. 2.The Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magisterial level, Coonoor 3.The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, Chennai. 4.The Section Officer, V.R. Section, Madras High Court, Chennai. 5.The Section Officer, Lok Adalat Section, Madras High Court, Chennai.+2 copies

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

3/4

¶36

V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.,

¶37

Tsg

¶38

Crl.R.C.No.277 of 2023

¶39

09.09.2023

¶40

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶41

4/4

K.M.Tamilselvan v. Subramani

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.M.Tamilselvan v. Subramani

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Divya Vs Sundar

Indian Squash Association Vs Squash Rackets Federation

K.Ramu, Vs P.P.Angaiah

S.Manoj (Minor) Vs Kuppan

Selvarasu Vs C.Sakunthala

Selvarasu Vs Raja