The High Court of Madras dismissed a civil revision petition as infructuous because the petitioner had vacated the premises and handed over possession, leaving nothing to adjudicate. The matter was then deleted from the pending list due to lack of electronic records.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P.No.2221 of 2007
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 08.09.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN
C.R.P.No.2221 of 2007
1.K.Ramu
2.The Eagle Plastic Industries Represented by its Partner K.Ramu, 132, New Street, Mannadi, Chennai – 600 001. .. Petitioners
Vs.
P.P.Angaiah .. Respondent
PRAYER : Entire Bundle is not available. Hence, no prayer.
For Petitioners : Mr.M.Kamalanathan
For Respondent : Ms.J.Anandhavalli
O R D E R
Mr.M.Kamalanathan, learned counsel for the Civil Revision
Petitioners submits that the Civil Revision Petitioners has vacated the premises and handed over the possession. Therefore, nothing remains to
1/2
C.R.P.No.2221 of 2007
V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN,J.
be adjudicated in the revision. He has also made an endorsement in the bundle. The same is recorded and the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
08.09.2023
Index:Yes/No Speaking Order :Yes/No Neutral Citation:Yes/No VS/MKN 2
To The VII Judge, Small Causes Court, Chennai.
C.R.P.No.2221 of 2007
2/2
K. Ramu and The Eagle Plastic Industries
P. P. Angaiah
V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
