V.Padmavathi v. M.Anandhan
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed a criminal original petition challenging a 20% deposit condition imposed while suspending a sentence, noting the condition had already been met.
What the court decided
Crl.O.P.No.29391 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 08.08.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH
Crl.O.P No.29391 of 2022
and Crl.M.P.No.17992 of 2022
V.Padmavathi, Proprietorix, M/s.Sri Vinayaka Traders, No.7, KNK Road, Karungalpalayam, Erode 638 003
...Petitioners
vs.
M.Anandhan, Proprietor, M/s.Jaya Vainayaga & Co., No.25 Vairapalayam Road, Karungalpalayam Post, Erode 638 003 Rep by his Power Agent, M.Muthukrishnan, Manager.
...Respondents
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V.Padmavathi, Proprietorix, M/s.Sri Vinayaka Traders
- respondent
M.Anandhan, Proprietor, M/s.Jaya Vainayaga & Co.
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court