Disposed

Ganesan v. Robert Inkarsal

Madras HC7 Aug 2023CRL OP/17487/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court considered a petition by an accused absconding trial for cheque bounce to recall a non-bailable warrant. The court accepted the petitioner's undertaking to appear regularly and directed him to file a separate petition within two weeks for the recall of the warrant.

What did the court decide?

The petition was disposed of; the petitioner was directed to file a fresh petition for recall of NBW within two weeks.

Ganesan Vs Robert Inkarsal — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

Crl.O.P.No.17487 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 07.08.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH

¶6

Crl. O.P.No.17487 of 2023

Ganesan

... Petitioner

Vs.

Robert Inkarsal ... Respondent

¶11

PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to pass an appropriate order or direction, directing the Learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Perambalur to recall the Non-Bailable Warrant issued on 30.01.2023 in C.C. No.355 of 2022 against the petitioner.

¶12

For Petitioner : M/s. M. Vijaya Ragavan

¶13

O R D E R

¶14

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to

¶15

recall the non bailable warrant issued by the learned J udicial

¶16

Magistrate No.1, Perambalur in C.C.No.355 of 2022.

¶17

The petitioner is arrayed as accused in C.C.No.355 of 2022,

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

1/4

¶20

Crl.O.P.No.17487 of 2023

¶21

on the file of the learned J udicial Magistrate No.1, Perambalur , for

¶22

the offences punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

¶23

The petitioner was absent during the trial in C.C.No.355 of

¶24

2022, on the file of the learned J udicial Magistrate No.1, Perambalur . Therefore, non bailable warrant came to be issued on 30.01.2023.

¶25

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner

¶26

undertakes that the petitioner shall appear before the Court below regularly on all future hearing dates without fail.

¶27

Considering the undertaking given by the petitioner, the petitioner is directed to appear before the learned J udicial Magistrate No.1, Perambalur , within a period of two weeks from today and file a petition to recall the NBW issued against him. The concerned Magistrate is directed to consider the same on merits

¶28

2/4

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

Crl.O.P.No.17487 of 2023

¶31

and pass orders on the same day.

¶32

Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition stands disposed

¶33

of.

¶34

07.08.2023

¶35

Index : Yes/No Speaking order:Yes/No Neutral citation:Yes/No rka

¶36

¶37

The learned J udicial Magistrate No.1, Perambalur ,

¶38

The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras

¶39

N. ANAND VENKATESH, J

¶40

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶41

3/4

¶42

Crl.O.P.No.17487 of 2023

¶43

rka

¶44

Crl.O.P.No.17487 of 2023

¶45

07.08.2023

¶46

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶47

4/4

Ganesan v. Robert Inkarsal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ganesan v. Robert Inkarsal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sureshkumar Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

Sathishkumar Vs State Rep by

Subhash Chandra Bhargava Vs Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.

Shanmugam Vs Inspector of Police

Vellingiri Vs Inspector of Police

Ragupathi Vs the Inspector of Police