Dismissed

Dilli Babu.S v. State Rep by

Madras HC10 Feb 2023CRL OP/17190/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras dismissed a Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 CrPC to quash proceedings. The Court held that since investigation was completed and the charge sheet filed, nothing survived for adjudication, rendering the petition infructuous.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner at liberty to participate in trial to contest the case as petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Dilli Babu.S Vs State Rep by — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

CRL.O.P.No.17190 of 2021

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 10.02.2023

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HON'BLE Ms.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA

¶6

Crl.O.P.No.17190 of 2021 and Crl.MP.No.9421 of 2021

¶7

Dilli Babu

¶8

.. Petitioner/Accused-1

¶9

Versus

¶10

The State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Taluk Police Station, Chengalpattu.

¶11

... Respondent/complainant

¶12

Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the records in Cr.No.54 of 2020 on the file of the respondent and quash the same.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.P.C.Santhosh Kumar For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (crl.side)

¶14

Page No.1 of 4

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

CRL.O.P.No.17190 of 2021

¶17

O R D E R

¶18

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the

¶19

proceedings in Cr.No.54 of 2020 on the file of the respondent.

¶20

2. The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent

¶21

police submits that in this case, investigation has been completed and charge sheet has already been filed.

¶22

3. In view of the completion of the investigation and filing of charge sheet, nothing survives for further adjudication in this petition. Hence, the petitioner is at liberty to participate in the trial and raise all the points which he made in this petition and contest the case.

¶23

In the result, the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

10.02.2023

Index: Yes/No jrs

Page No.2 of 4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

CRL.O.P.No.17190 of 2021

¶29

To:

¶30

1.The Inspector of Police, Taluk Police Station, Chengalpattu.

¶31

2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

¶32

Page No.3 of 4

¶33

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶34

CRL.O.P.No.17190 of 2021

¶35

R.N.MANJULA, J.,

¶36

jrs

¶37

Crl.O.P.No.17190 of 2021 and Crl.MP.No.9421 of 2021

¶38

10.02.2023

¶39

Page No.4 of 4

¶40

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Dilli Babu.S v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dilli Babu.S v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Sengottaiyan, Age 36 Vs S.a.Kulandaivel

Murugesan (M/33) Vs S.Thangarasu

M.M.Rangasamy Vs the Inspector of Police

Rajkumar Vs the Inspector of Police

V.Kannan, Male, Aged About Vs C.Subbaraya Gounder

P.Shanmugam Vs State Rep.by