Murugesan (M/33) v. S.Thangarasu
Case brief
What is this about?
The single bench disposed of a criminal revision petition for non-prosecution due to the petitioner's failure to appear or file objections.
What did the court decide?
The Criminal Revision Petition was dismissed for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
Crl.RC No.1555 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 08.02.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA
Crl.R.C. No.1555 of 2017
Murugesan
... Petitioner
Vs.
S.Thangarasu ... Respondent
Criminal Revision Petition is filed under Section 397 r/w. 401 of Criminal Procedure Code, to set aside the order passed by the II Additional District Sessions Judge, Erode in Crl.Appeal No.210 of 2016 dated 10.07.2017 confirming the order of acquittal dated 29.08.2016 passed by the Judicial Magistrate Fast Track Court No.II Erode, in C.C. No.149 of 2014.
For Petitioner : No appearance
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Murugesan
- respondent
S.Thangarasu
Coram
R.N. Manjula
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court