Dismissed
V.Kannan, Male, Aged About v. C.Subbaraya Gounder
Madras HCCRL RC/1558/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRL.RC.No.1558 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 10.02.2023
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE Ms.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA
Crl.R.C.No.1558 of 2017 and Crl.MP.No.15679 of 2017
V.Kannan
.. Petitioner
Versus
C.Subbaraya Gounder Rep.by his Power Agent,Balakrishnan. ... Respondent
Criminal Revision Petition filed under Section 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to set aside the judgment in Crl.A.No20 of 2017 dated 13.09.2017 by the learned 2nd Additional District and Sessions Court, Tirupur, by confirming judgment passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate Court (Fast Track Court) Tirupur in C.C.No.138 of 2014 dated 25.01.2017.
ORDER
This Criminal Revision Petition has been filed to challenge the judgment in
Crl.A.No.20 of 2017 dated 13.09.2017 by the learned 2nd Additional District and Sessions Court, Tirupur, by confirming judgment passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate Court (Fast Track Court) Tirupur in C.C.No.138 of 2014 dated 25.01.2017.
Page No.1 of 2
CRL.RC.No.1558 of 2017
R.N.MANJULA, J.,
2. There is no representation for the petitioner for the last consecutive two
hearings. Even today when the matter was posted under the caption” for dismissal”, there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence the Criminal Revision Petition is dismissed for Non Prosecution. Connected Miscellaneous Petition is also closed.
10.02.2023
Index: Yes/No jrs
To:
Crl.R.C.No.1558 of 2017 and Crl.MP.No.15679 of 2017
Page No.2 of 2
V.Kannan
C.Subbaraya Gounder
R.N.MANJULA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court