The High Court of Judicature at Madras disposed of a company winding-up petition filed under the Companies Act, 1956. Counsel for the petitioner sought and obtained permission to withdraw the petition.
Permission to withdraw the petition granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn; no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.P.No.2 of 2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 07.08.2023
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
C.P.No.2 of 2011
M/s.Shiva Trading Company, A proprietary Concern, Represented by its Proprietor, Vijaykumar Gupta
... Petitioner
Vs.
M/s.Conee Chains Private Limited, Represented by its Managing Director, Manish Govindji Gandhi
... Respondent
PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 433 (e) read with Sections 434 (1) (a) and 439 of the Companies Act 1 of 1956 read with Rules 95 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 to direct that the respondent Company Conee Chains Private Limited be wound up under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and to direct that the cost of the petition be paid to the petitioner from out of the common estate of the respondent Company.
For Petitioner : Mr.B.V.Dhiviyadharsini for Mr.S.Namasivayam
For Respondent : No Appearance
1/3
C.P.No.2 of 2011
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to
withdraw this petition. She has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
07.08.2023
Index : Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes / No Neutral Citation Case: Yes / No ab
2/3
C.P.No.2 of 2011
ABDUL QUDDHOSE. J.,
ab
C.P.No.2 of 2011
07.08.2023
3/3
3 provisions across 2 enactments
M/s.Shiva Trading Company
M/s.Conee Chains Private Limited
Abdul Quddose
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
