Dismissed
The Official Assignee v. B.Vijaya Kumar
Madras HCAPPLN/35/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
of 2019 in I.P.No.118 of 2002 The Official…
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
¶1
Appln. (I.P.)No.35 of 2019 in
¶2
I.P.No.118 of 2002
¶3
The Official Assignee, High Court, Madras. ... Applicant
¶4
Vs.
¶5
- B.Vijaya Kumar and Another ... Respondents
¶6
ABDUL QUDDHOSE.J.,
¶7
The learned Official Assignee seeks permission of this Court to withdraw Appln. (I.P.)No.35 of 2019 on the ground that the said application has now become infructuous, since the first respondent has paid the outstanding dues and has also vacated the property. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle.
¶8
- Accordingly, this application is dismissed as infructuous.
¶9
07.08.2023
¶10
ab
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
The Official Assignee, High Court, Madras
- respondent
B.Vijaya Kumar
Coram
AI extract
ABDUL QUDDHOSE
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Annai Builders Real Estates Pvt. Ltd., Rep.by its Special Officer Mr.K.Prabhakaran, Vs K.Prathip
M/s.Rambal Limited, Rep.by its Director, Mr.v.S.Vaidyaraman, Vs M/s Arvauto E-Com Pvt. Ltd., Rep.by its Managing Director, Mr.Vignesh Mohan
Rti Austria Gmbh, Rep.by its Authorized Signatory, Mr.Niels Hufnagl, Vs M/S. Shriram Epc Ltd.
M/S.Shiva Trading Company, Vs M/S.Conee Chains Pvt. Ltd.