M/s.Rambal Limited, Rep.by its Director, Mr.v.S.Vaidyaraman, Vs M/s Arvauto E-Com Pvt. Ltd., Rep.by its Managing Director, Mr.Vignesh Mohan

M/s.Arvauto E-Com Pvt. Ltd., represented by its Managing Director Vignesh Mohan ... Respondent Prayer: Arbitration Original Petition (Commercial Division) filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to appoint a Sole Arbitrator and direct the Arbitration Proceedings to commence.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.N.Sharma

¶12

For Respondent : Mr.K.K.Vijay Vigneshwar

¶13

ORDER

¶14

This petition has been filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and

¶15

Conciliation Act seeking for appointment of an Arbitrator by this Court.

¶16

1/2

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

Arb.O.P.(Com.Div.) No.121 of 2023

¶19

vga

¶20

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

¶21

2.A counter affidavit has been filed by the respondent stating that there is no Arbitration Agreement between the parties under the Agreement for Closure of Memorandum of Undertaking dated 31.03.2022, which was subsequent to the Memorandum of Undertaking dated 12.07.2020, which contained an Arbitration Clause.

¶22

3.Learned counsel for the petitioner has made an endorsement in the

¶23

Court Bundle stating that liberty may be granted to file a Civil Suit against the respondent for recovery of the outstanding dues payable to the petitioner by the respondent. The said endorsement is recorded.

¶24

4.Accordingly, this petition is disposed of by granting liberty to the petitioner to file a Civil Suit against the respondent seeking for recovery of outstanding sums due and payable to the petitioner together with interest and costs.

¶25

04.08.2023

¶26

vga

¶27

Arb.O.P (Com.Div.) No.121 of 2023

¶28

2/2

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

M/s.Rambal Limited, Rep.by its Director, Mr.v.S.Vaidyaraman, v. M/s Arvauto E-Com Pvt. Ltd., Rep.by its Managing Director, Mr.Vignesh Mohan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s.Rambal Limited, Rep.by its Director, Mr.v.S.Vaidyaraman, v. M/s Arvauto E-Com Pvt. Ltd., Rep.by its Managing Director, Mr.Vignesh Mohan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s.Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Limited, Vs Veeramma

Va Tech Wabag Limited, Represented by its Authorized Signatory Vs Limited Liability Company Amur Gas Chemical Complex and 3 others

The Military Engineering Service Chief Engineer(Af) Bengaluru, Vs The Surface Tech (India) Pvt. Ltd., Rep.by its Managing Director, a.K.Thakur

Annai Builders Real Estates Pvt. Ltd., Rep.by its Special Officer Mr.K.Prabhakaran, Vs K.Prathip

Rti Austria Gmbh, Rep.by its Authorized Signatory, Mr.Niels Hufnagl, Vs M/S. Shriram Epc Ltd.

S.Prakash Babu Vs Amudha,Ias.