B.Sridharan v. v.M.Pazhani
Case brief
What is this about?
A single judge dismissed a contempt petition holding that the respondent society complied with prior directions. The court closed the contempt proceedings but granted liberty to challenge the society's subsequent order.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition dismissed; liberty granted to challenge the society's order dated 11.08.2023.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 16.08.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
Contempt Petition No.954 of 2023
B.Sridharan
.. Petitioner
-vs-
V.M.Pazhani President, I.I.668, Kiliyur Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Society, Kiliyur Village & Post - 606 102. Ulundurpet Taluk, Kallakurichi District.
.. Respondent
Petition under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act has been filed to punish the respondent for his willful disobedience and non-compliance of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.27892 of 2022, dated 19.10.2022.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent society complied with prior court orders by passing a final representation order.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
B.Sridharan
- respondent
V.M.Pazhani
Coram
Abdul Quddhose
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court