This order allowed an application under Section 29-A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking an extension of time for the Arbitral Tribunal to pronounce an award. Respondents raised no objection. The court granted an additional six-month extension.
Extension of time for the Arbitral Tribunal to pronounce the Arbitral Award by another period of six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Application No.3840 of 2023 ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.
K.Kandasamy .. Applicant vs 1.R.Sulochana 2.M.Gandhimathi 3.R.Revathi 4.N.Suriyanarayanan 5.Bhanumathy .. Respondents
This application has been filed under Section 29-A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking for extension of time for the Arbitral Tribunal to pronounce the Arbitral Award.
2.Learned counsels for the respective respondents have no objection for allowing this application.
3.Accordingly, this application is allowed as prayed for by extending the time for the Arbitral Tribunal to pronounce the Arbitral Award by another period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
16.08.2023
vga
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.
vga
Application No.3840 of 2023
16.08.2023
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the time limit for pronouncing the arbitral award should be extended upon the application of the applicant.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
K.Kandasamy
R.Sulochana
M.Gandhimathi
R.Revathi
N.Suriyanarayanan
Bhanumathy
ABDUL QUDDHOSE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
