Disposed

S.Rani and 6 others v. Kakarla Usha I.A.S.

Madras HC2 Nov 2023CONT P/2468/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Contempt petition filed for willful disobedience of orders in W.P. No. 28107 of 2022. Court held that compliance was established via record placed on record, so petition suffered no further adjudication. Petition closed with liberty to challenge specific representation rejection.

What did the court decide?

Contempt petition closed with liberty to challenge the rejection of individual representations under law.

S.Rani and 6 others Vs Kakarla Usha I.A.S. — Contempt of Court | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

Cont.P. No.2468 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 02.11.2023

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

¶6

Contempt Petition No.2468 of 2023

1.S.Rani

2.P.Bharathy

3.R.Vimalraj

4.D.Radhakrishnan

5.C.Nagarajan 6.D.Veeramani 7.M.Ilayaraja .. Petitioners

¶12

Versus

¶13

Tmt.Kakarla Usha, IAS., The State of Tamil Nadu, Secretary to Government, School Education Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 9. .. Respondent

¶14

Prayer: Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Court Act 1971 to punish the respondent for the willful disobedience of the orders made in W.P.No.28107 of 2022, dated 20.10.2022.

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

1/4

¶17

Cont.P. No.2468 of 2023

¶18

For Petitioners : Mr.K.Sathish Kumar For Respondent : Mr.Naveen Kumar Government Advocate

¶19

O R D E R

¶20

This Contempt Petition has been filed to punish the respondent for the willful disobedience of the orders made in W.P.No.28107 of 2022, dated 20.10.2022.

¶21

2. The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent s has placed before this Court the proceedings of the respondent dated 04.10.2023 in compliance with the directions given by this Court on 20.10.2022 passed in W.P.No.28107 of 2022, which is the subject matter of this contempt petition. The individual representations of the petitioners have been rejected under the aforesaid proceedings of the respondents. Since the order dated 20.10.2022, passed in W.P.No.28107 of 2022, which is the subject matter of this contempt petition has been complied with, nothing survives for further adjudication in this contempt petition.

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

2/4

¶24

Cont.P. No.2468 of 2023

¶25

3.Accordingly, this contempt petition is closed. However, liberty is granted to the petitioners, if so aggrieved, to challenge the proceedings of the respondent dated 04.10.2023, which has been placed on record today in the manner known to the petitioners under law.

¶26

02.11.2023

¶27

Index: Yes/No Speaking / Non speaking ssr To

¶28

The State of Tamil Nadu, Secretary to Government, School Education Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 9.

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

3/4

¶31

Cont.P. No.2468 of 2023

¶32

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

¶33

ssr

¶34

Contempt Petition No.2468 of 2023

¶35

02.11.2023

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶37

4/4

S.Rani and 6 others v. Kakarla Usha I.A.S.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Rani and 6 others v. Kakarla Usha I.A.S.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Madhana Gopal Vs Santhanagopalan Srinivasan and 2 others

K.Madhana Gopal Vs Santhanagopalan Srinivasan and 2 others

Dr.C.B.Paul Chellakumar Vs M/s.Campus Abroad Educational Services

K.Balaji Vs Kakarla Usha I.A.S.

K.Murugesan and 2 others Vs Supriya Sahu Ias., and another

Faisal Khan Vs Leena Paulose