K.Madhana Gopal v. Santhanagopalan Srinivasan and 2 others
Case brief
What is this about?
of 2023 and C.S.(Comm. Div.)No.174 of 2023…
What did the court decide?
interim injunction made absolute
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
O.A.Nos.611 to 613 of 2023 and C.S.(Comm. Div.)No.174 of 2023
ABDUL QUDDHOSE.J.,
There is no representation on the side of the 2nd respondent / 2nd defendant. In O.A.Nos.611 to 613 of 2023 all the respondents have been duly served. The 3rd respondent / 3rd defendant has already been set exparte by this Court on 06.10.2023. The 2nd respondent / 2nd defendant has entered appearance through a learned counsel, whose name is printed in the cause list today. However, the 1st respondent / 1st defendant remains unrepresented though the name of the 1st respondent / 1st defendant is printed in the cause list today. The plaintiff is having the benefit of an interim order in O.A.Nos.611 to 613 of 2023 which has been periodically extended by this Court until further orders. Since there is no representation on the side of the respondents and in view of the fact that the plaintiff is having the benefit of the interim order, which has been extended periodically, the interim injunction granted by this Court in O.A.Nos.611 to 613 of 2023 is made absolute and O.A.Nos.611 to 613 of 2023 is allowed as prayed for.
01.11.2023
ab
1/2
ABDUL QUDDHOSE.J.,
ab
O.A.Nos.611 to 613 of 2023 and C.S.(Comm. Div.)No.174 of 2023
01.11.2023 (1/2)
2/2
Abdul Quddhoose
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court