In two civil miscellaneous second appeals, the appellant requested and obtained leave to withdraw the appeals. The High Court dismissed the appeals on the ground of withdrawal, with no order as to costs, and closed the connected petition.
The civil miscellaneous second appeals were dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.S.A.(MD)Nos.19 and 20 of 2017
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 15.11.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI
C.M.S.A.(MD)Nos.19 and 20 of 2017
and
C.M.P.(MD)No.4752 of 2017
C.M.S.A.(MD)No.19 of 2017
S.Jeyakumar ... Appellant
Vs.
Latha @ Latha Devi ... Respondent
PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal filed under section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 r/w 100 of C.P.C, to set aside the common judgment and decreetal order dated 09.02.2017 made in H.M.C.M.A.No.04 of 2015 on the file of the District Judge, Sivagangai, confirming the common judgment and decreetal order dated 04.08.2014 made in H.M.O.P.No.41 of 2013 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Sivagangai.
For Appellant : Mr.S.Veerana Samy
For Respondent : No appearance
C.M.S.A.(MD)Nos.19 and 20 of 2017
C.M.S.A.(MD)No.20 of 2017
S.Jeyakumar
... Appellant
Vs.
Latha @ Latha Devi ... Respondent
PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal filed under section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 r/w 100 of C.P.C, to set aside the common judgment and decreetal order dated 09.02.2017 made in H.M.C.M.A.No.04 of 2015 on the file of the District Judge, Sivagangai, confirming the common judgment and decreetal order dated 04.08.2014 made in H.M.O.P.No.159 of 2011 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Sivagangai.
For Appellant : Mr.S.Veerana Samy For Respondent : No appearance
JUDGMENT
When the Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeals were taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel appearing for the appellant sought permission of this Court to withdraw the Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeals. He
also made an endorsement to that effect. The said submission is recorded.
C.M.S.A.(MD)Nos.19 and 20 of 2017
15.11.2023
NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes Sml
To
Copy to
The Section Officer, Vernacular Records, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
C.M.S.A.(MD)Nos.19 and 20 of 2017
L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.,
Sml
C.M.S.A.(MD)Nos.19 and 20 of 2017
15.11.2023
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the second appeals filed under section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act require adjudication when the appellant sought dismissal by withdrawal.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S. Jeyakumar
Latha @ Latha Devi
L. Victoria Gowri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
