Dismissed

Tata Aig General Insurance v. Mahendran

Madras HC15 Nov 2023CMA(MD)/731/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

TATA AIG General Insurance Company Ltd. filed three Civil Miscellaneous Appeals under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 challenging Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal decrees. The appellant failed to appear. The bench dismissed the appeals as non-prosecution and closed connected petitions.

What did the court decide?

Civil Miscellaneous Appeals dismissed as non-prosecution due to absence of the appellant; connected petitions closed.

Tata Aig General Insurance Vs Mahendran — Motor Accident Claims | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

C.M.A.(MD)Nos.731 to 733 of 2018

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 15.11.2023

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI

¶6

C.M.A.(MD)Nos.731 to 733 of 2018

¶7

and

¶8

C.M.P.(MD)Nos.8272 to 8274 of 2018

¶9

C.M.A.(MD)No.731 of 2018

¶10

TATA AIG General Insurance Company Ltd., No.1, Earthraj Salai, Egmore, Chennai. ... Appellant

¶11

Vs.

¶12

1.Mahendran 2.Arjunan ... Respondents

¶13

PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, to set aside the award and decree dated 02.02.2018 made in M.C.O.P.No.642 of 2012 on the file of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (I Additional District Court [PCR]), Tiruchirapalli.

¶14

1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

C.M.A.(MD)Nos.731 to 733 of 2018

¶16

For Appellant : No appearance For R-1 : Mr.N.Sudhagar Nagaraj For R-2 : No appearance

¶17

C.M.A.(MD)No.732 of 2018

¶18

TATA AIG General Insurance Company Ltd., No.1, Earthraj Salai, Egmore, Chennai.

... Appellant

Vs.

1.John Peter

2.Arjunan ... Respondents

¶23

PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, to set aside the award and decree dated 02.02.2018 made in M.C.O.P.No.664 of 2012 on the file of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (I Additional District Court [PCR]), Tiruchirapalli.

¶24

For Appellant : No appearance For R-1 : Mr.N.Sudhagar Nagaraj For R-2 : No appearance

¶25

2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

C.M.A.(MD)Nos.731 to 733 of 2018

¶27

C.M.A.(MD)No.733 of 2018

¶28

TATA AIG General Insurance Company Ltd., No.1, Earthraj Salai, Egmore, Chennai.

¶29

... Appellant

¶30

Vs.

¶31

1.Thangavel 2.Arjunan

¶32

... Respondents

¶33

PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, to set aside the award and decree dated 02.02.2018 made in M.C.O.P.No.740 of 2012 on the file of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (I Additional District Court [PCR]), Tiruchirapalli.

¶34

For Appellant : No appearance For R-1 : Mr.N.Sudhagar Nagaraj For R-2 : No appearance

¶35

JUDGMENT

¶36

When the matter was taken up for hearing on 12.10.2023, there was

¶37

no representation on behalf of the appellant. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed today i.e., on 15.11.2023 under the caption “For

¶38

3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶39

C.M.A.(MD)Nos.731 to 733 of 2018

¶40

Dismissal”. Even today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant.

¶41

2.Hence, these Civil Miscellaneous Appeals are dismissed as Non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Civil Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

¶42

15.11.2023

¶43

NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes Sml

¶44

¶45

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, The First Additional District Court (PCR), Tiruchirapalli.

¶46

Copy to

¶47

The Section Officer, Vernacular Records, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶48

4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶49

C.M.A.(MD)Nos.731 to 733 of 2018

¶50

L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.,

¶51

Sml

¶52

C.M.A.(MD)Nos.731 to 733 of 2018

¶53

15.11.2023

¶54

5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Tata Aig General Insurance v. Mahendran

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tata Aig General Insurance v. Mahendran

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shenbagam @ Ayyasamy KONE(DIED),2).K.PERIASAMY Kone, Vs The Special Tahsildhar

Shenbagam alais Ayyasamy Kone (Died), 2.K.Periyasamy Kone Vs the Special Tahsildar

Shenbagam @ Ayyasamy Kone (Died), 2.K.Periyasamykone Vs the Special Tahsildar

Karuppiah @ Mani Chettiar, Vs Saraswathi No 1/2 B-BLOCK-34

R.Rajeswari Vs Indhira

S. Jeyakumar Vs Latha@Latha Devi