Dismissed
R.Rajeswari v. Indhira
Madras HCAS(MD)/194/2016
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
A First Appeal where appellants were absent despite dismissal directions was dismissed as non-prosecution under Section 96 CPC, closing the connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition with no order as to costs.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed as non-prosecution; no order as to costs; connected petition closed.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
A.S.(MD)No.194 of 2016
¶2
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
¶3
DATED : 15.11.2023
¶4
CORAM:
¶5
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI
¶6
A.S.(MD)No.194 of 2016
¶7
and
¶8
C.M.P.(MD)No.11863 of 2016
¶9
1.R.Rajeswari
¶10
2.Mangayakarasi
¶11
3.Logamaniyammal
¶12
Bharatha (Died)
¶13
4.M.Arunthathi
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
R.Rajeswari
- appellant
Mangayakarasi
- appellant
Logamaniyammal
- appellant
Bharatha
- appellant
M.Arunthathi
- appellant
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court