Allowed

T.Sridharan v. N.Ranjani

Madras HC12 Dec 2023CMP(MD)/11370/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court allowed a petition filed under Order 41 Rule 19 and Section 151 CPC to restore the first appeal (A.S. No. 19 of 2022) against a judgment dated 04.12.2019, setting aside an earlier order. The appellate registry was directed to restore the appeal for hearing.

What did the court decide?

Petition allowed; First Appeal in A.S. (MD) No. 19 of 2022 restored; Main case posted for 18.01.2024.

T.Sridharan Vs N.Ranjani — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

CMP(MD). No.11370 of 2023

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Civil Appellate Jurisdiction

¶3

Tuesday, the Twelfth day of December Two Thousand and Twenty Three

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice L. VICTORIA GOWRI

¶6

CMP(MD). No.11370 of 2023 in A.S(MD)No.19 of 2022

¶7

T.Sridharan

¶8

... Petitioner/Appellant/Plaintiff

¶9

¶10

1 N.Ranjani 2 P.Mahalakshmi 3 B.Umarani 4 S.A.Fathima

¶11

... Respondents/Respondents/Defacto Complainant

¶12

Prayer :-

¶13

This Petition filed under order 41 Rule 19 & Sec.151 CPC., to restore the first appeal in A.S.(MD).No.19/2022 by setting aside the order dated 26-07-2022 this appeal and thus render justice.

¶14

Prayer in A.S(MD)No.19 of 2022:-

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Appeal Suit is filed under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code, against

¶16

1/3

¶17

CMP(MD). No.11370 of 2023

¶18

the judgment and decree dated 04.12.2019 made in O.S.No.58 of 2016 on the file of the 1^st Additional District Judge, Madurai.

¶19

ORDER:- This Petition coming on for orders on this day and upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr. R. Suriya Narayanan, Advocate for the Petitioner and of Mr. S.Siva Ilayaraja, Advocate for the respondents, this Court made the following order:

¶20

“This petition is filed to restore the first appeal in A.S.(MD)No.19 of 2022 by

¶21

setting aside the order dated 26.07.2022.

¶22

Heard both sides.

¶23

Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, this

¶24

petition is allowed. Registry is directed to restore the First Appeal.

¶25

Post the main case on 18.01.2024 .”

¶26

Sd/-

¶27

Assistant Registrar(CS-II)

¶28

// True Copy //

¶29

/12/2023 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS )

¶30

Sml

¶31

¶32

The 1^st Additional District Judge, Madurai.

¶33

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶34

2/3

¶35

CMP(MD). No.11370 of 2023

¶36

Copy to:

¶37

The Section Officer, VR Section,

¶38

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.(2 Copies)

¶39

The Section Officer, Judicial Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai (for posting the Appeal on 18.01.2024)

¶40

ORDER DATED : 12/12/2023

¶41

HEARING DATED : 18.01.2024

¶42

========================== ORDER

¶43

==========================

¶44

CMP(MD). No.11370 of 2023 in

¶45

A.S(MD)No.19 of 2022

¶46

Giving direction and etc. as stated within.

¶47

AMS/21.12.2023 3P 5C

¶48

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023

¶49

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶50

3/3

T.Sridharan v. N.Ranjani

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

T.Sridharan v. N.Ranjani

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Selvi Vs T. Somasundaram

State Express Transport Vs Pon Esakki (Age 30)

C.Karuppiah Vs v.Dhanalakshmi

V. Malliga Vs K. Ramachandran

G.Natarajan, Vs G.Jeyaraman

Alagarsamy, Vs Rajarathinam