Dismissed

G.Natarajan, v. G.Jeyaraman

Madras HC13 Dec 2023AS(MD)/245/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

An appeal suit seeking to set aside a judgment was dismissed as infructuous because a corresponding final decree application had already been allowed in a related proceeding on the file of the Additional Sub Judge, Madurai. No costs were awarded. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition was closed.

What did the court decide?

The Appeal Suit was dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Connected miscellaneous petition closed.

G.Natarajan, Vs G.Jeyaraman — Execution and Attachment | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

A.S.(MD).No.245 of 2015

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

Dated : 13.12.2023

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI

¶6

A.S.(MD)No.245 of 2015 and

¶7

M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2015

G.Natarajan

... Appellant

Vs.

1.Jeyaraman

2.Thayammal

¶13

3.Lakshmi

¶14

4.Vasantha

¶15

5.Iyammal

¶16

6.Vijaya

¶17

7.Santhi

¶18

... Respondents

¶19

(Respondents 1, 3 to 7 already recorded. Respondents 1, 3 to 7 recorded as legal heirs of deceased. The second respondent as per the order of this Court dated 29.09.2015 made in M.P.(MD)No.2 of 2013 in A.S.(MD)No.SR19591 of 2010 by MDJ. Memo USR No.4332 of 2015)

¶20

PRAYER : Appeal Suit filed under Section 96 of Civil Procedure Code, to set aside the judgment and decree dated 30.11.2009 made in O.S.No. 279 of 2004 on the file of the Fast Track Judge No.I, Madurai.

¶21

1/4

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

A.S.(MD).No.245 of 2015

¶24

For Appellant : Mr.S.Palani Velayutham For R1 : Mr.S.Nateshraja For R2 : Died For R3 and R6 : Dismissed For R4, R5 and R7 : No Appearance

¶25

JUDGMENT

¶26

When the case was called up for hearing today, the learned counsel

¶27

appearing for the appellant brought to the notice of this Court that the final decree application was numbered as I.A.No.248 of 2011 in O.S.No. 163 of 2011 on the file of the learned III Additional Sub Judge, Madurai and thereafter, the said application was allowed on 31.08.2018 on the file

¶28

of the learned III Additional Sub Judge, Madurai.

¶29

2.In view of the above, this Appeal Suit is dismissed as

¶30

infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected

¶31

miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶32

13.12.2023

¶33

NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes Mrn

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

2/4

¶36

A.S.(MD).No.245 of 2015

¶37

¶38

1.The III Additional Sub Judge, Madurai.

¶39

2.The Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.I, Madurai.

¶40

3.The Section Officer, V.R. Section,

¶41

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court , Madurai.

¶42

3/4

¶43

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶44

A.S.(MD).No.245 of 2015

¶45

L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.

¶46

Mrn

¶47

A.S.(MD)No.245 of 2015

¶48

13.12.2023

¶49

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶50

4/4

G.Natarajan, v. G.Jeyaraman

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

G.Natarajan, v. G.Jeyaraman

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V. Malliga Vs K. Ramachandran

T.Sridharan Vs N.Ranjani

S.Selvi Vs T. Somasundaram

Alagarsamy, Vs Rajarathinam

M/S.Tamilnadu State Vs Victoria Sahayarani

The Managing Director Vs Thulasimani