Allowed
M/S. Sivamani Spinning Mills Ltd. v. the Recovery Officer
Madras HCCMP/8842/2023
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
of 2023 in WA.SR.No.48123 of
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.No.8842 of 2023 in WA.SR.No.48123 of 2023
S.VAIDYANATHAN,J. &
R.KALAIMATHI ,J.
Having been satisfied with the reasons stated in the Affidavit filed in support of this petition and also in view of no objection having been stated by the learned counsel appearing for other side, this petition is allowed and the delay of 58 days in filing the above Appeal is condoned.
(S.V.N.,J) (R.K.M.,J) 20.04.2023
arr
Note: Registry is directed to number the Appeal, if it is otherwise in order and post next week.
S. VAIDYANATHAN
R. KALAIMATHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court